social studies
as an aside
social studies
Friday
19Feb2010

Not Christo


Not Christo, originally uploaded by Webslog.

A long wall of plywood and two-by-fours. Painted white. Runs along the road for a while before petering out, its work of hiding rock piles, empty space and "clean fill" done.

Not Christo Either This is exactly the shot I was trying to get and one of the first shots I got with a new (to me) Canon P. It uses a 35mm f/2.8 Leica-type screw-mounted lens.

Tuesday
16Feb2010

Sex, Lies and Polygamy - HBO's Big Love Just Keeps Crazyin' Along

Can't get enough of that sweet crazy-ass stuff.  Carnivale was great, but Big Love is proving itself to be at least as good as The Sopranos in its first three seasons, with story lines that never get wrapped up; instead they just go dormant.

So who thinks:

 a) Ana's baby is NOT Bill's but Ana is gaming the Hendricksons?

 b) this is proven only after several more plot developments when we find out that Bill has been shooting blanks for the last two seasons?

 c) JJ's playing the long con with Albie and Juniper Creek (marry the prophet's wife after having married the prophet's daughter, rising in power at the same time that Albie's (strangely only) wife Lara now has the ultimate smoking gun to use against Albie ("Hey JJ, guess what about Albie?") in an effort to seize the assets of the latter, making JJ less of an enemy threat to the Hendricksons, but only just?

 d) that if you walked in to find your closeted Mormon lover hanging from the rafters, sobbing, kissing his feet and in general leaving DNA all over the damn place is a not-good idea?

 e) The Green Family is a silent bankroller of the Families for Fundamental Change that's attacking the casino?

 f) Wanda was molested by her father ("hello baby-doll")?

 g) that Marjean is the next place the Greens will use to attack the Hendricksons?

 h) Nicki backed way off the "Bill, you're the Prophet" thing for anyone's good?

 and was that Selma in a nightgown on the bed at the Esperanza being appealed to by some old guy on bended knee?

This show just keeps getting better, and by better I mean bat-shit crazier.


Thursday
04Feb2010

The House of Mirth or "Real Housewives of Victorian-Era New York"

Just finished listening to a librivox.org reading of Edith Wharton's House of Mirth.  Considered on of the first novels of manners, Mirth charts the course of a woman, Lily Bart, as she falls from a comfortable position in New York society. 

Read by a single reader (sort of a rarity within the crowd-sourcing melieu that is librivox), Mirth had me completely wrapped up. 

How wrapped up?  Wrapped up like driving in the car with with this expression on my face. 

What Wharton managed to do was tell a story in which no one does a thing to harm any one else but the landscape is littered with corpses anyway.  This is due, in no small part, to the kind of inside knowledge of "polite society" that she enjoyed.  Writing from the inside, she delivers observation and commentary in perfect measure, never once succombing to the urge to editorialize.  We see Wharton's characters as they would see each other.

Altogether, an amazing read and a great way to start off the reading/listening year.  I'd used librivox to listen to another Wharton books -- The Age of Innocence -- and while it felt a little more like a Gilded Age melodrama, Wharton's ear for dialogue and the secret conversations hiding in plain sight made it a great story as well.

Someday, when I get to go back to college, I would love to do some work that examined the dystopian side of the American dream.  It would involve a critical reading of Sinclair Lewis, Theodore Drieser and Edith Wharton to see what similarities existed between their three worldviews. 

Specifically, it would delve into the psychology of the striver -- the individual who wants to advance him- or herself within a social contruct -- and how "Old Money" responded to the striver during the period between the end of the Civil War and the First World War.  There's something facinating to me in the way literature documented how Money responded to the rising middle class during this time.  Further, that set of assumptions and behaviors seems to have direct analogues in the ways that we (Americans) treat and view the rest of the world as power (geopolitical, financial) shifts from our hands into those of "upstarts" like China, India and Malaysia.

Whether my dissertation ever sees the light of day, House of Mirth is a hell of a story and easily deserves its vaunted position as one of America's "important" books.  Too bad there aren't books groups out there that reconsider old works instead of muddling about with crap like The Westfalian Cheese Ladies' Literature and Harmony Club Explains It All to You Over Cups of Tea in Urkutsk.

Thanks for reading.

Saturday
30Jan2010

First thoughts, uninformed by fact, on Apple's iPad

Like the rest of you, I waited with bated breath for news of Apple's newest magical mystery device.  And Tuesday's announcement did not disappoint.  As his events typically do, Jobs' intro of the iPad gave us a polished whirlwind tour of the new device, focusing on the object itself and its world of possibilities.  The general consumer press and Wall Street love this stuff.

I'm hardly as jaded as much of the blogosphere by Jobs' One More Thing Wonderstuff Revivals.  But Tuesday's keynote left as much unanswered for me as it whetted my appetite to actually see one of these things and rub its aluminum & aresenic-free glassiness against my cheek.

Here are a couple of thoughts and questions about what the iPad will and won't do for us when it actually hits the streets a little fewer than 60 days from today.

File systems and exchange - We've been promised iPad versions of Apple's lickable iWork productivity apps, including Pages (word processing) and Keynote (presentation building and presenting).  What we didn't see was how documents created on the iPad will sync with desk top machines and laptops.  

So I draft a Keynote at the office and have a flight to Walla Walla that evening.  The iPad promises editing capabilities on that Keynote along with the ability to present from the machine.  What will I do with that file when I get back to the office?  EMail it?  iChat it?  Or will Cupertino give us a better way to share those files within our own personal area network?  Which leads me to...

Proximity-based syncing and sharing - outside of Apple's iPhone native apps which sync seamlessly with their desktop counterparts (iTunes/iTunes, Photos/iPhoto, Calendar/iCal, Contacts/Addressbook), apps that create new content (recording apps specifically) require a desktop sync application that allows the new content to be moved from the iPhone's file system to that of the lap/desktop machine.  What I'd like to be able to do is know that pix that I shoot on my iPhone will sync with BOTH my laptop and iPad without my having to tell it to.  

In order for this to happen, an application like iSync will have to evolve yet again to provide easily configurable directional syncing.  Too, as users, we'll have to start thinking differently about "where" we put our self-created content and how we might want to be able to access it.

An incredible consumption device, but how much of a creation device? So take word processing - Will it be handled by an app?  (Yes.  Pages).  But what about people who use Word, OpenOffice, TextEdit and the trillion other ways to capture text and display it on a page?  Will Microsoft deliver Word for iPad that allows .docs to be opened, edited and saved?  Or would we look to something more cloud-based like Google Apps to provide a web-based application that allows me to write in a Google doc.  

And if this is the fix, what will my capabilities be when my entry-level WiFi-only iPad is running outside of a network?  How will I access cloud-stored documents?

In my little digital Nirvana, both the stuff that I create and the stuff that I own is available all the time, everywhere, regardless of the device I happen to be using.  My iTunes plays anywhere, anytime on either my iPhone, iPad or MacBook.  And it wouldn't care if I lived in a mixed ecosystem (Windows machine at work, iPad in my backpack and a Blackberry Storm in my pocket).  The copy that I drafted on my laptop machine at work would be available to me to edit on my iPad at home or, if I were in a pinch, on my iPhone.

Based on what the keynote told us, the iPad occupies a very legitimate ground between the desktop and the pocket.  But in order for it to become the magical device Apple envisions it to be, we'll have to learn more about how it will live in harmony with my other two platforms.  

Saturday
30Jan2010

Don't Be a Lying Asshat On-Line - My Personal Ethics Statement

I think Walt Mossberg and the crew over at www.allthingsd.com have done a great job in outlining their individual ethics policies.  In addition to laying out the ground rules by which he and his colleagues live, the policies make for a refreshing read.  It's an interesting exercise to go through for anyone who makes things and shares them on line, in books or over the air in that it forces you to think hard about what you will and won't allow in your content, as well as how you view the issues of content ownership and attribution.

So snowed in on a sleepy Saturday, I've drafted my disclosure statement.  It's the promises and premises I make to the six people who read my blog.

I am a copywriter by day, employed by Griffin Technology.  In addition to being bound by a mutual NDA signed with that company, I also operate under my company's shared policy on social media which says, to paraphrase: 

  1. don't share private stuff (defined here as just about anything I see, hear, create or do related to Griffin)
  2. don't say libelous or slanderous stuff
  3. be clear in the fact that the things you say and post outside the company do not in any way represent the opinions and views of Griffin Technology
  4. don't be an asshat on-line.

When I do talk about Griffin products or those of our competitors, I will try and make clear the fact that my opinions are mine.

I moderate comments only to ensure that discourse remains civil.  This here is a respectable establishment. We'll have no name-calling, hate speech, or flinging of mud, poo or other gross brown things or their digital equivalents.

Opinions found herein, except where noted, are my own.  That means I take responsibility for what I say here.  I try not to get the facts wrong.  When they are wrong, or incomplete, or misrepresented, I welcome the reader to point them out.  I will do my best to rectify anything in need of rectification, retract anything in need of retraction, and in general, be honest and forthright.

I give credit where credit is due.  The internet has made possible the wholesale use and repurposing of content in ways so flexible that it falls to the individual creator of content to try and respect the wishes on other content creators in how their stuff gets used.  I will link back to articles when I quote them.  I will link and cite photos and other graphics whenever I use them.  And if you're the owner of any content that I use and you don't want me to use it, I will remove it if you ask me to. 

So what I'm about.  How about you?

Thanks for reading.